JOIN OUR MAILING LIST

CONTACT US

PRESSROOM

2006 Portfolio

Highlights

Resources

Links

2006 PORTFOLIO

Portfolio Highlights

What is the Portfolio?

Key Findings

Key Implications

Key Implications

  1. Arts and Culture is Accessible and Universally Appealing
    Ticket prices are reasonable. While the old stereotype of tuxedoes and evening gowns may persist in some minds, the reality is that today's arts and culture patron is far more likely to be a school-age child whose ticket was extremely affordable if not free.

    There is tremendous variety and choice. The 218 participating organizations present 56,000 events in a single year, making Philadelphia one of the most culturally rich communities in the world. Locals take advantage of this cultural bounty. There were 12 million cultural visits in 2005—the equivalent of 3 visits for every man, woman and child in the region.

  2. Arts & Culture is a Significant Employer—But Compensation Lags

    Arts and Culture delivers a competitive advantage for Philadelphia in attracting and retaining jobs. The industry itself directly provides 14,000 jobs. However, the unusual nature of these jobs has significant implications for the sustainability of the sector and the people who work within it.

    Almost half of the jobs are part-time or contract positions. Many positions lack health insurance, pensions, and income predictability.

    While labor is the largest single expense for most cultural organizations, the sector is not keeping pace with comparable service sector employers. Advertising agencies, architects, attorneys, banks, film companies, financial services, hotels, restaurants, and sports teams all spend more of their budgets on employees.
  3. Corporate & Government Support Lags—Competition for Private Funding is Intense

    With notably less corporate and local government support compared to other major cities, how have cultural organizations in the Greater Philadelphia region made ends meet?

    First, they've generated enough earned income (i.e., ticket/admission sales) to cover half of all expenses. Second, they've relied on widespread individual donor support and contributions from private foundations. Finally, to keep costs down, they have relied heavily on individuals to volunteer their time.

    It is unclear whether the intense competition for private funding is healthy or sustainable. As we look at concurrent fundraising campaigns, it appears that today's individual donor base may be overtaxed. Smaller organizations seem particularly vulnerable.

    The industry must either expand its base of contributed support or reduce expectations.
    For the near term, local public support and corporate sponsorship appear to be most underutilized. For the long term, the sector must continue to engage more of Southeastern Pennsylvania's total population of 3.8 million people, so that the number of donations expands beyond its current level of 270,000 per year.

  4. Many Cultural Organizations are Operating on the Brink

    From a financial perspective, our cultural fabric is fraying. Fully one quarter of cultural organizations operated with deficits in excess of 10% during the last fiscal year. If this situation continues, they will be operating in a constant state of crisis management.

    Only a third of cultural organizations, primarily Large and Very Large organizations, have had the ability to build endowments—a financial bulwark against operating deficits. Medium and Small organizations, with little or no endowment, are more financially vulnerable. A high percentage of organizational assets, including buildings, equipment, and restricted endowments, are illiquid—which limits the organizations' flexibility to respond quickly to financial threats or opportunities.

    In a marketplace where a multitude of options compete for consumers' leisure time, money, and attention, one must market to build brand and sales. Ironically, it appears that tight budgets may be squeezing out the very marketing investments that would attract more audiences and earned income for cultural organizations. It is a vicious cycle where lack of marketing perpetuates lack of sustainability.

Looking Ahead. . .

It is our hope that in reviewing the wealth of information in this report, policy makers, civic leaders and arts managers will elicit insightful data that informs decision-making, leads to candid conversation about the future of the sector, and provokes new questions that the Cultural Alliance can address.

Recognizing that economic impact is a critical measure by which all industries are evaluated, we will continue to work with local and national partners to advance this important element.

As we go forward, we will track trend data, monitor changes in the sector, and report them in our next Portfolio. Part of our responsibility as an active partner in the long-range planning for Greater Philadelphia is providing a clear picture of this sector that helps make Philadelphia unique. Ultimately this picture will allow us to capitalize on our competitive advantages and invest scarce resources strategically to ensure our future.

Like you, we are committed to a vision of Philadelphia as a place where people are passionately involved in and supportive of arts and culture—a place admired throughout the world for its quality of life made possible by diverse cultural experiences and creativity. We believe that this first publication of Portfolio, and those that follow, will be an important contribution to our shared long-term success.

The Portfolio was made possible by The Pew Charitable Trusts and William Penn Foundation

 

© 2004 Greater Philadelphia Cultural Alliance | Home | Privacy Policy